A Note on Method

It has occurred to me, after perusing some of the commentary advanced elsewhere (particularly Jeremy Jose's insightful comments on his weblog and elsewhere) that I have been remiss in a formal description of the principal methods used in this project.  In truth there are at least two distinct projects act work involving the interpretive framework of the LEO test.  Some results of the first project are available, while the results of the second, an inventory that gathers individual-level data, has not yet been described.  It would seem that the best movement forward may be to explore a few of the methodological points of this inquiry, since time has not permitted the continuing inquiry of individual political actors for which I had hoped.  Hopefully, more will follow...

Comments

[Andrew Testing]

Here are my thoughts

[Andrew Testing]

test

[Jonathon York]

Andrew Testing?
I have been remiss in keeping up with this project, largely as a result of my regular obligations at the college. I am still working on the project, even though it has been dormant over the last few months. A new election campaign season is nearly upon us and I'll need to revisit these issues, since my goal is to finish developing the tool and demonstrate and effective, accurate application of the model.